Working portfolio

I build things because a real lesson, explanation or workflow needs to work better.

This is the practical side of my teaching: classroom resources, mathematical explanations, science investigations, browser tools and software systems. I record what the work is for, what has actually been built, what evidence is available and what still needs attention.

Four kinds of work

Teach. Explain. Build. Refine.

The same project may cross more than one area. These collections provide a useful starting point rather than forcing the work into one narrow category.

Method

The method is deliberately ordinary.

I notice a repeated problem, clarify what is actually difficult, make the smallest useful response, test it in realistic conditions and keep revising. The process is similar whether the result is a worksheet, proof, practical investigation or application.

Read the full build process
  1. 01
    Notice

    Identify the real friction rather than the loudest symptom.

  2. 02
    Understand

    Clarify the Mathematics, Science, learner need or workflow.

  3. 03
    Make

    Build the smallest response that can be used and checked.

  4. 04
    Test

    Check accuracy, failure states, accessibility and real constraints.

  5. 05
    Record

    Keep evidence, decisions, limits and recovery information.

  6. 06
    Refine

    Preserve what worked and change one justified thing at a time.

Complete catalogue

Every case study, with its maturity visible.

Search the complete record, combine filters and sort without losing the distinction between work in use, working releases, prototypes and concepts.

Field
Showing the complete portfolio.
Case studies state what exists and what does not.

Current development

Work that is still teaching me something.

These projects are active, incomplete or deliberately experimental. Their next steps are shown rather than hidden behind a finished-looking card.

Evidence and boundaries

A portfolio should show the limit as clearly as the result.

I do not want a prototype described as a finished product or a classroom resource described as research evidence. The labels below explain how I use maturity terms across the catalogue.

In use
Applied in classroom, professional or operational work. It can still be revised.
Working release
Usable and testable now, with documented behaviour and known limitations.
Prototype
Substantial behaviour exists, but reliability, evidence or scope remains incomplete.
Concept
An explored direction or early implementation that should not be treated as complete.

Connected writing

The reasoning behind the work.

The articles explain how I plan, teach, model, test and revise. They are written from practice rather than as product announcements.